The Department of Justice locked up Haim Braverman, a man from Morristown NJ, for making on line threats with a baseball bat in a video he made against a female reporter who referred to Haim’s Rebbe as a cult leader. Braverman was arrested in October of 2024 and spent five months in lockup before the Judge allowed him to bond himself out. The DOJ stated that Braverman made a threatening video while he stood in front of a portrait of a “deceased Rabbi.” Its not clear which Rabbi was in the picture. Braverman is a bearded religious man from Morristown.

According to the Department of Justice, Haim made a video of himself saying that this particular female reporter “said something about him that is the most disgraceful thing to an old man who to his dying day stood up and listened to people and the divinity of who he is is the reason why I have him hanging up in my house . . . You’ll get what’s coming to you . . . I’ve never met someone . . . if I could fking kill you right now, I would not even . . ., fk it I’ll give you the steel bat. I wouldn’t even stop. I’d kill you. Dead. I’m threatening a death sentence against you.” Haim also made a video in which he said: “She decided to go ape sh*t on . . .the Rabbi . . . claiming that he . . . created some sort of cult. After I heard what. . . she said, I will go to prison, gladly find her and kill her. . . I will find a fking weapon and fking kill her. I am outraged.”

Haim is 45 years old and apparently owns a modest condo outside of Morristown. It doesn’t appear that Haim has any prior arrests or ever committed any acts of violence in the past. The Justice Department released a picture of Haim holding a baseball bat, which was a picture from one of Haim’s videos where he held a baseball bat threatening the reporter.

It doesn’t appear that Haim ever sent the video to the reporter. The Feds have focused more attention on arresting people who make on line threats. Kanye West said “I’m a bit sleepy tonight but when I wake up I’m going death con 3 On JEWISH PEOPLE“, which basically means he wants to nuke the Jewish people. Why wasn’t Kanye busted by the Feds?

Haim recently pleaded guilty to the Federal crime making it illegal to make threats on line. It doesn’t look like the Feds are looking to sentence him to more than a year of incarceration. Haim is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Sammi Malek of the U.S. Attorney’s Office National Security Unit in Newark. Sammi is an NYU law grad and identifies herself as Persian / Iranian.

I’m not convinced that arresting Haim Braverman prevented a crime against the reporter. People make threats all the time, on and off the internet. In prison I was threatened on an almost daily basis. Nobody got arrested. People make threats in poor neighborhoods all the time, most of it is just street talk / trash talk. Nobody gets arrested. How is law enforcement supposed to figure out the difference between street talk and real true threats? The expression don’t drink and dial now applies to the Internet. The Feds should have focused their limited resources on actually investigating whether Haim was a true threat before they bashed in his door and hauled him away.

If you have stories of crime or corruption that you would like to report to Larry Noodles, or with to make a monetary donation, or buy the Larry Noodles Book Part I, please send an email to [email protected]. Your privacy will be FULLY protected! If you are entitled to a whistle blower reward for anything you report on the Larry Noodles blog, you hereby agree that Larry Noodles gets 99.99% of the reward and you get 0.01% of any recovery. If you have been personally offended by anything reported in this blog please send a special request and say a prayer. Never underestimate the power of prayer. If you are planning to spend any amount of time behind bars and need some help from a prison consultant, I am your man.

*************************CONNECTICUT BAR SUSPENSION: DAY 4,031

As of the date of 5/19/2025 my law license has been suspended 4,031 days by the State of Connecticut on the basis that this blog is not acceptable to the Bar regulators. I have asked the Bar regulators, as well as Judges, repeatedly to explain in plain English, or legalese, or even pig Latin, their reasoning, but so far the only answer I have received was from Committee Chairman Gary Friedle who told me that my First Amendment rights were somewhat “limited” and that my blog postings were “inappropriate” for a member of the CT Bar. I have been trying to reinstate my Bar license since the year 2000, but have been told for years, and many hearings, that this blog is “needs to be permanently removed.” Chairman Friedle went so far as to tell me that I needed to remove my blog from the wayback machine. The only CT attorney brave enough to defend the First Amendment and recommend that I get reinstated to the bar is a criminal defense lawyer with vast experience, named Richard R. Brown. I would highly recommend his services should you ever have the unfortunate experience of getting in trouble with the law.

The guy who started the Larry Noodles blog observed a two year Sabbatical in which he didn’t drink alcohol, cut his hair, touch dead bodies or write blogs about the Goat. Even if he didn’t take his Nazarite vow, his blog was deemed too “scathing” for the State of Connecticut Bar regulators and ordered shut down by the authorities. In spite of self censoring his blog for two years, the Bar regulators demanded that he go back to the future and remove his blog from the Wayback machine, ex post facto. Larry Noodles only knows how to operate a simple espresso machine in Eastern Standard Time and attempted to appease the Bar regulators with cups of espresso, to which the regulators responded, CANCELLED! This is the thanks he gets after helping the New Haven State’s Attorneys Office get a guilty verdict against a pedophile Rabbi who ran a child sex trafficking operation for decades right under the noses of the New Haven Police Department.

These are the names of the CT Bar Committee members, with no background in First Amendment law, who believe this blog is beneath the dignity and integrity of the legal profession and voted to cancel the Larry Noodles blog: Chairwoman Kathleen Dunn (wife of former paperboy to the Noodles family: Bridgeport State’s Attorney Kevin Dunn), Edward F. Czepiga (PI lawyer), Cindy Robinson (med mal lawyer), Doug Mahoney (med mal lawyer), Robert Lotty (insurance defense), Sean K. McElligott (PI Lawyer), Chairman Gary Friedle (semi retired), New Haven State’s Attorney Kate Morgan (rookie), John C. Matulis Jr. (PI lawyer) Rene Rosado (no website / no active cases listed on the civil, family or criminal court docket, but he voted in the minority to reinstate Joe Ganim to the CT bar), Kelly Barnett (insurance defense, counsel for The Travelers), David A. Curry (no website / no cases listed on civil, family or criminal docket), and John B. Nolan (deceased – passed away during my hearings) and Marie Louise Villar. None of these attorneys have any background or experience in First Amendment law.

Attorney Norm Pattis, was never subjected to any sanction by the above mentioned Connecticut Bar regulators when he wrote the following on his blog after he was sanctioned by Judge Bellis in the Alex Jones case:   “The judge is stunned by my misconduct. Me, I am stunned the state trusts her with a robe and a gavel. Folks are afraid of this judge, and not for good reason. Why would the judge do this? I think Emerson teaches why: ‘When you strike at a king, you must kill him.’  The same, apparently, applied to queens. My office had moved to disqualify the judge, taken emergency interlocutory appeals to the state Supreme Court — one of which went to full briefing, and otherwise challenged her ability to be fair and impartial to Alex Jones. We clashed in a televised trial versus Jones, a trial in which she so lost control of the proceedings that she at one point sat gaping as a plaintiff’s lawyer and Jones exchanged heated words; I shouted objections as though to an empty room.  We’re preparing to appeal the $1.5 billion default judgment against Jones, a case we believe this judge butchered with her rulings.”