The old man slowly walking down the steps of the New Haven courthouse with a cane is the infamous Paul Boyne, public enemy number one in the State of Connecticut. Boyne is fighting for his life trying to stay out of jail. Boyne is accused of cyber stalking Connecticut family law Judges.

Family court Judge Jane Grossman testified today about how she feared Boyne’s blog would incite someone to harm her. She admitted that she never took any action to stop the blog by filing a restraining order, a lawsuit or any other type of legal action to take down the blog. She testified that she had never been directly contacted by Mr. Boyne, nor anyone connected with Mr. Boyne. She said she didn’t do anything about the blog until 15 months after she started reading it every day. The Judges all testified that they read the blog every day, were extremely frightened, and yet did nothing about it for well over a year. In 2017 the Feds were contacted by Chief Administrative Judge Elizabeth Bozzutto about the blog. The Feds looked into the blog but didn’t believe any crime had been committed. Bozzutto was working with disgraced CT Chief State’s Attorney Richard Coangelo.

Judge Jane K. Grossman was asked by the prosecution to define the word “Zionism.” I’m not sure why Prosecutor Jack Doyle asked such a stupid, irrelevant question, but her response was that Zionism means “hate for the Jewish people and extermination of the Jewish people.” Jane Grossman graduated from bottom ranked Quinnipiac Law School, worked for Legal Aid for some years, and was appointed to the Bench by Gov. Malloy in 2011, yet she cannot define the word Zionism? Jane Grossman is not Jewish, despite her Jewish sounding name, and despite the fact that Paul Boyne thought she was part of the “Jewdiciary conspiracy” that protects pedophiles. Grossman currently presides over criminal cases in Waterbury.

Grossman testified that she presided over a case called Joriz Tiberi v. Frank Tiberi, and issued a decision that referenced Paul Boyne and Boyne’s blog. In her decision she stated that the Plaintiff mother was assisted by Boyne in her family case in filing pleadings with the court. Grossman wrote the following: “This blog consists of racist, homophobic and anti-Semitic tirades aimed at members of the bench and bar in Connecticut and other states. The legal commentary is sophomoric and riddled with profanity. While purporting to be anonymous, the blog comments only cases Boyne has an interest. The content includes reports and other confidential court documents. It also includes the names, pictures and home address of targeted lawyers and judges with detailed instructions on how to shoot and kill those identified.” Its not clear how Boyne’s alleged involvement with Ms. Tiberi in her family case in 2022 has anything to do with the criminal charges against Boyne. It appears to be an attempt by the prosecutor to smear Boyne before the jury. The prosecutor offered no proof that Boyne had anything to do with Tiberi.

Grossman decision in Tiberi:

The prosecution also sought to introduce evidence that Paul Boyne contacted Judges, clerks and other court personnel to gather files and exhibits in pending family cases, in order to rebut Boyne’s defense that he never directly contacted any Judges. The fact that Boyne allegedly contacted Judges looking for court documents does not prove anything. In fact the prosecution didn’t offer any proof that it was Boyne, and not someone else impersonating Paul Boyne, who was contacting the clerk’s offices looking for records. The Gotcha moment for the prosecution never came.

Paul’s attorney presented evidence of Boyne’s entire blog, consisting of thousands of pages, not just the 15 blog posts admitted by the prosecution that Boyne is charged with. Boyne testified that the blog is run by an organization consisting of a number of individuals who thought that they had the First Amendment right to post thousands of materials, including links to court cases, legal articles, legal research, etc…, and they were giving their readers the red meat that they wanted. Nobody from Paul’s organization took the witness stand to defend Paul, as they would assert the Fifth Amendment against self incrimination. The State offered no evidence to rebut Boyne’s testimony. At one point Prosecutor Doyle got into a heated debate with Boyne about a Federal First Amendment case, in which Doyle blurted out “he’s making an improper legal conclusion!” and dropped the questioning.

I’ve had many conversations with Mr. Boyne over the years. My email is actually mentioned in the police reports as having been found on Boyne’s computers. I’m a Jew. I also practiced law for 20 years in the CT family courts. Boyne knows I’m a Jew and knows I practiced family law. Boyne never attacked me or insulted me for being a Jew or accused me of being a member of the conspiracy. Boyne has tried to convince me that there is some kind of conspiracy of Jewish family court judges protecting pedophiles. Paul Boyne does post racist and anti-Semitic rants on his blog, but its not illegal to be a racist, an Anti-Semite or an Anti-Dentite. The Catholic Church has preached for some 2,000 years that the Jews are collectively responsible for the death of Jesus. Should the Catholic Church be indicted for being the theological source of Jewish persecutions throughout the centuries? Or did the statute of limitations run on that claim?

The benefit of living in a free society is that the Government is not supposed to try to control people’s thoughts and opinions. The good Judges of Connecticut police themselves and are careful to use politically correct language in their daily interactions with each other and members of the public. The Connecticut media is careful to run stories that do not offend any particular ethnic or racial group. Yet the State of Connecticut is one of the most racially segregated States in the areas of housing, employment, incarceration and public education in the country. “Connecticut’s metropolitan areas, including Bridgeport and Hartford, remain among the most segregated in the nation in terms of the race and ethnicity dissimilarity index and among the highest in income inequality…” CT Legislative Housing & Segregation Study, 2024. Why is the most politically correct Blue State the most racially segregated State in the Nation? What has the Judiciary done to correct racial segregation other than hire more Uncle Toms to positions of power?

Paul Boyne apparently sent me some emails back in 2020, according to the police reports, trying to convince me to “kill all the lawyers” in the words of William Shakespeare. I was not convinced. I was never incited to kill a lawyer, although it has crossed my mind at times. Fortunately the government cannot punish me for my thoughts, at least not yet.

Judge Jane Grossman testified that Paul Boyne somehow was able to convince family law litigants of the “Jewdiciary” conspiracy to protect pedophiles, such as Joriz Tiberi, and disbarred attorney Nickola Cunha. Boyne’s attorney asked one of the Judges who presided over Boyne’s divorce proceeding what sort of hypnotic powers Boyne had to convince people to subscribe to his theories of the “Jewdiciary” conspiracy. I was strong minded enough to resist the Paul Boyne nerve pinch or mind meld.

Paul presents as well spoken, intelligent and relaxed on the witness stand. How could anyone be relaxed on the witness stand facing years behind bars if convicted? Mr. Boyne posted on his blog the following quote from Thomas Jefferson: “The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.” Mr. Boyne’s attorney asked the lead investigator whether Thomas Jefferson was ever arrested and charged with stalking or making threats. Objection SUSTAINED.

On cross examination Boyne was asked about his divorce and custody battle that was dragged through the courts almost twenty years ago. Boyne claimed he suffered PTSD from that experience, which is not unusual for anyone involved in a custody battle. Mr. Boyne choked up a few times on the witness stand talking about how he lost custody of his children. Yet the prosecution was not satisfied and had to twist the knife in Boyne’s back and ask him whether he failed to pay child support twenty years ago. Give me a break! What does this have to do with whether Boyne cyber stalked Judges? Attacking Boyne below the belt could backfire for the prosecution.

Paul Boyne’s testimony has concluded. The lawyers are going to meet on Friday, 3/6 at 11 AM to conduct a “charging conference” which means they will discuss with Judge Brown how the jury should be instructed. The judge will take their proposed instructions and come up with his own instructions which will be read to the jury on Monday morning. It will take Judge Brown about an hour to read the instructions to the jury. The instructions are long and convoluted legalese which nobody understands, not even the lawyers. If the jurors ask the Judge to explain the instructions in layman’s terms the judge will instead repeats the same legal mumbo jumbo, and tell the jurors in so many words to ‘figure it out yourself’, we couldn’t resolve it, we don’t care anymore, just end it already!

The courtroom was packed with observers. Ed Mahoney from the Hartford Courant was there. Another reporter from 360Law was there. Even Judge Linda Munro was there to observe the proceedings, even though she wasn’t called to testify. Nobody was there from the New Haven Independent or the New Haven Register. Not many rags left in Connecticut to report on the workings of the CT Judiciary, which is probably the reason Judge Brown felt he had the power to increase Boyne’s bond to $1.5 million, sending him to jail for two weeks, because Boyne published the State’s witness list of 70 odd people, 90% of whom did not show up in Court to testify. Boyne’s attorneys filed an emergency motion with the Supreme Court. Before the Court had a chance to rule on it Judge Brown set Boyne free. See the appeal below. If a Judge orders you shackled for no reason you cannot do anything about it. Talk about abuse of power.

If Boyne is convicted he may end up in Niantic prison, which is for older inmates, unless Judge Brown lets him stay out of jail during his appeal. Either way the State spent a small fortune prosecuting Mr. Boyne for the last 4-5 years. The Judge, two prosecutors and two public defender each earn about $200K a year. That adds up to about almost a million dollars a year in attorney salaries. Add in their support staff, investigators, court personnel, parole officers, marshals, bailiffs, etc… and you have enough money to fill the gap in the New Haven Police Department’s budget, which was recently raided by the Police Chief, who resigned in disgrace. You have to wonder how many Kia’s were stolen and crashed near the courthouse while Boyne’s trial was being conducted. The City of New Haven doesn’t have enough money to do much of anything to stop crime, yet the State had set aside a huge budget to prosecute Mr. Boyne.

If you have a tip, story, suggested correction, or wish to make a tax deductible financial donation to this website, or need assistance brainstorming a legal problem you are having with your nemesis, please reach out to the following email: larrylokshen@gmail.com